Yeah this woman is deluded at this point, it was far from it, when I saw the streams, the chat was negative, toxic and even people didn't like some of the content.

As when I did the review of it other night, the fandome was actually pretty poor tbh, Yes we got THE BATMAN, yes we got some Black Adam/The Flash stuff

But 80% of it was CW.

It was piss-poor, and if not the worse DC Convention I have ever watched to be honest. really breaks my heart.

Also just remember, this is the same woman who labelled all of us as toxic, even thoses who don't support Snyderverse.

She sent a very clear message, she told us don't watch the films if we don't support the direction, a majority of us here don't.

She also told us to pretty much go fuck ourselves. Now she thinks DC Fandome was well received when it clearly wasn't, Honestly all, personally, I've had enough with this woman, how she is still the CEO of Warner Bros. baffles me to the max.

I have a lot of things to deal with on my plate right now, so I most likely won't be posting or commenting for a bit, or much. I'll be back one day, just need to keep my focus on these things. Just thought I'd let y'all fellow D.C. fellers know. See you all soon.

Okay, so, this theory's a long shot, and I would be shocked if it were true, but I think it has a little plausibility to it, so I thought I'd share: what if Matt Reeves' The Batman is DCEU canon, and they just haven't told us? Remember, DC Films and Warner Bros are trying to distance themselves from the Snyder films, so they probably would want to avoid the DCEU connections in the marketing, since they might believe that'll get fewer fans in the theaters (WB is dumb enough for that). But the timelines do match up (save Gordon, but they can just retcon that, they're lazy enough), and Reeves has a track record for respecting other films in a franchise, as he proved with the Planet of the Apes films. Plus, we know he respects Snyder and his work.

He may be trying to revitalize the DCEU Batman by giving us one of his earliest adventures, and giving him more depth by showing us his past. Imagine the story being told in flashback by Ben Affleck, or maybe he shows up in a sequel!

I know, I know, it's a long shot, but I just thought I'd share. Anyone have any ideas, maybe that this theory has more water that I'm not seeing?

Believe or not, for me, calling Starro an IT sounds like an insult!!! I prefer to call Starro a THEY!!!!! Who share the same opinion as me!?

After he hinted at John Williams's definitive Superman March for Superman's cameo and references in his fun score for Shazam! two years ago (in addition to taking inspiration from both Williams's score for Superman: The Movie and Alan Silvestri's score for Back to the Future), since Michael Keaton's Batman is gonna be in The Flash in addition to Batfleck, do you any of you suppose that he'll use Elfman's classic Batman theme to represent Keaton's Batman, and Junkie X.L.'s themes for Batman from both Zack Snyder's Justice League and Zack Snyder's Justice League: Justice Is Gray Edition to represent Batfleck? That kind of juggle would create a very interesting musical aural contrast between the two Batmen, if you ask me, not to also mention, of course, the two different universes that they respectively come from. And what do you think his themes for the Flash will sound like? After Junkie X.L. created themes for him in the latter film, do any of you think that Wallfisch will use those to represent the Flash in this film?

B.t.w., for those of you who wonder or at all curious, one of the reasons why I make posts regarding the franchise's music, or make comments in my posts about its music, is because I'm a drummer, and music is one of the things that I'm gonna do in life. Plus, music is one of the things that helps shape the emotions and themes that the film carries over, second only to how the cast creates it. And depending on the franchise, iteration, you name it, of certain characters and franchises, I'm either indifferent or very selective.

Well its me again...

So I thought to let you know personally in deph of my feelings of Fandome, so am going to sit here and type and be honest with everyone within the DC Discussions.

So as most.. well everyone here has watched Fandome on Saturday 16th October 2021. and many of us was coming in with high expectations and excited, some feeling nervous like myself and some with no expectations whatsoever its going to be bad.

I was in the middle, I felt uneasy and nervous due to all the drama in the past year with the management, the merger and more.

So lets start with the positives.

Pros:-

• THE BATMAN - As a skeptic, I thought this movie would be bad, because well, I didn't really like the quick transition between Robert Pattinson and Ben Affleck, now because of what I've heard without Walter Hamada breathing down Matt Reeves neck about the Multiverse, its nice and clear to see what Reeves wants to do with the character, last year at Fandome, Walter Hamada couldn't let Matt Reeves talk about his version of Batman and what he wants to do with it, Hamada just kept talking about his shitty poorly planned Multiverse. Now hes not there, Reeves has given us an insight, the Trailer was nice too.

• THE FLASH - This trailer was probably my highlight of the Fandome, to see Michael Keaton, Hearing Ben Affleck's Batman's voice (thats what I heard anyway, don't judge) and he intense of the trailer I think we are in for a cracking movie

• BLACK ADAM - Okay, am going to be honest, this was my least favorite teaser, am not saying Adam is bad or anything, I just didn't think much of the teaser, was nice to see Dwayne Johnson getting his wish to play a character hes being fighting for for years.

Now thats the pros out of the way, lets move onto I guess Nutural

• BLUE BEETLE - Again, didn't really think much of this, but the concept art of the suit looks decent

• Batgirl - Again, a film am really skeptic about, Quite frankly it baffles me we are getting this DCEU film first before a Ben Affleck Batman film, bit of a joke to be really honest with you all.

Now... on to the cons... the worse.... oh dear.. Am not going to write bulletpoints, so ill explain this in a small paragraph.

DC Fandome spend 4 bloody hours with most ARROWVERSE content and to be honest, I was really close to turning the stream off. Yes I absolutely get Arrowverse has its own fans, but for DC, they think Arrowverse applies to liturally every single fan and it doesn't. When it comes to the Arrowverse, am serverly critical of it. I absolutely do not like that version of DC at all. I also have to mention that some of the stuff dragged, they kept going on and on and on and on and on. It nearly came to a point where I just wanted to sleepo through it. I also have to to add, unfortuantly we didn't get any news about the Ayer Cut, which is a massive disappiontment.

FINAL CONCULSION:-

Was the DC Fandome worth the wait and the 4 hours? No absolutely not, apart from some decent content and that, it was really a waste of time. Quite frankly as a DC Fan, am kinda upset DC Fandome didn't turn out that great as I thought it would, the whole franchise is still divided and is still seeing an unfamiler future. When I watched the stream on youtube, there was a lot of negativity on the chat, Its not exactly a surprise with the way Warner Bros and DC Films President Walter Hamada has treated us fans this year.

I think Fans seriously deserve some respect.

Peace.

I for one am inclined to think that the first Man of Steel sequel (not referencing B.v.S.D.o.J.) should be titled Man of Tomorrow. And since "The Dark Knight" has already been used, and that "Batman" has been used so many times in that character's films' and shows' titles, perhaps the first in Batfleck's trilogy should be called The Caped Crusader. But what do you all think???

AKA Braun Strowman